Skip to content

UK Lays Out Tough Child Data Privacy Rules

  • Tech

Republicans, Democrats Grapple Over Rules as Senate Impeachment Trial Starts

Republican and Democratic leaders in the Senate wrangled over proposed rules as the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump began on Tuesday. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), in an opening speech on the floor, sought to defend the Constitutional integrity of the Senate as envisioned by the Founding Fathers and called on senators to put the “historical precedent ahead of the partisan passion of the day.” He also remarked that his proposed rules are fair. The “straightforward resolution” he proposed will ensure that it is fair to all parties involved, including House Democrats and Trump’s legal team, McConnell said. If the Senate agrees to conduct an investigation and trial during the impeachment process, it would “upset the balance” of power between the House and the Senate, he continued, warning…

UK Lays Out Tough Child Data Privacy Rules

Social media sites, games, and other online services won’t be allowed to “nudge” British kids into revealing personal details or lowering their privacy settings, under tough new rules drawn up by the country’s privacy regulator.

The set of standards aimed at protecting children’s online privacy were released on Jan. 22 by the Information Commissioner’s Office for Parliament’s approval.

“There are laws to protect children in the real world—film ratings, car seats, age restrictions on drinking and smoking. We need our laws to protect children in the digital world too,” Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham said. “In a generation from now, we will look back and find it astonishing that online services weren’t always designed with children in mind.”

Tech companies won’t be able to use “nudge techniques,” such as making one option appear easier than the alternative, to encourage kids to provide unnecessary personal data or weaken or turn off their privacy protections. They’ll also have to verify a user’s age or instead apply the code’s standards to all users.

UK Lays Out Tough Child Data Privacy Rules Smartphone apps are shown in Miami on Oct. 29, 2019. (Wilfredo Lee/AP Photo)

Sharing or broadcasting a child’s location should be off by default, so should profiling kids for so-called behavioral advertising, the new rules say. Other requirements include collecting and holding a “minimum amount” of personal data and making “high privacy” settings the default. Online services should take children’s best interests into account and shouldn’t use their data to auto-recommend harmful content like videos advocating suicide or anorexia.

The “age appropriate design code” has 15 standards in all that must be met by apps, connected toys, social media platforms, online games, educational websites, and streaming services. They apply to any online service likely to be used by a child and to any companies offering their services in the UK.

Violators face punishment including, in serious cases, fines worth 4 percent of a company’s global revenue, which for the Silicon Valley giants like Facebook would equal billions of dollars.

Once Parliament gives its approval, companies will get a 12-month transition period to adapt to the new rules. They’re expected to come into full effect by autumn 2021.

Tech companies are coming under increasing pressure to tighten up online protection for young people, with authorities in the United States, Ireland, and elsewhere also working on updating their rulebooks.

By Kelvin Chan

This article is from the Internet:UK Lays Out Tough Child Data Privacy Rules

Supreme Court Denies House, Blue States’ Effort to Fast-Track Obamacare Appeals

The Supreme Court has rejected requests by the House of Representatives and Democratic-led states to expedite a review of a lawsuit challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare, meaning the future of the health care law is unlikely to be decided until after the 2020 presidential election. Lawmakers and state officials from a coalition of blue states asked the high court in a pair of appeals earlier this month to take up the case and review the lower court’s decision on an expedited schedule. They argued that the court’s expeditious consideration is necessary because of the uncertainty the lower court’s decision has on health insurance and the health care marketplace, as well as for millions of Americans who have purchased coverage under Obamacare (pdf). In December, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled…