Skip to content

Mail-in Ballots Received 2 Weeks Late Must be Counted in Election: Michigan Judge

Biggest Domestic Threat Is Lone Attackers Self-Radicalized Online: FBI Director

FBI Director Christopher Wray told a House panel on national security threats that no single organization or ideological affiliation represents the biggest risk but, instead, it is individuals who self-radicalize online and carry out attacks that pose the most serious threat to the homeland. At Thursday’s hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee, Wray was asked by Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) whether the greatest domestic threat to homeland security was posed by right-wing or left-wing extremism. Wray responded by saying the biggest danger comes from people who become radicalized online and then carry out lone-wolf attacks against poorly defended targets. “We assess that the greatest threat to the homeland, to us here domestically, is not one organization, certainly not one ideology, but rather lone actors largely self-radicalized online who pursue…

Mail-in Ballots Received 2 Weeks Late Must be Counted in Election: Michigan Judge

A Michigan judge ruled Friday that mailed ballots received up to two weeks after the Nov. 3 election must be counted, as long as it’s postmarked by no later than Nov. 2.

It’s the second significant ruling extending the typical deadline in a crucial swing state, boosting the possibility that Americans won’t know who won the presidency on election night as an unprecedented number of voters are allowed to vote by mail.

Michigan Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens wrote on her 21-page ruling that “for the avoidance of doubt,聽an absent voter ballot that is postmarked by no later than November 2, 2020, and received within 14 days after the election, is eligible to be counted.”

While many states are allowing wider mail-in voting because of the COVID-19 pandemic,聽Michigan voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2018 that lets anybody vote by mail, or absentee.

But state law still rejected any absentee ballots not delivered to election officials by 8 p.m. on Election Day, plaintiffs, including the Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans argued in a lawsuit filed in June.

“Consistent with the emergency relief adopted by a Wisconsin federal court鈥攁nd approved by the U.S. Supreme Court鈥攅lection officials should be required to count ballots postmarked by Election Day and received for up to 14 days after the election to allow for the delivery of delayed absentee ballots,” they argued.

Stephens, who was appointed to her current position by the聽Michigan Supreme Court, granted the injunction sought by the plaintiffs in the new ruling.

Mail-in Ballots Received 2 Weeks Late Must be Counted in Election: Michigan Judge LaSean Madden collects absentee ballots outside the Detroit Elections Department in Detroit, Mich., on Nov. 4, 2016. (Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images)

“The evidence in this case stands uncontroverted and establishes that the mail system is currently fraught with delays and uncertainty in light of the COVID-19 pandemic,” she wrote.

Michigan’s Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who was named in the lawsuit, didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The state struggled to conduct the primary election earlier this year, ending up rejecting over 10,000 mail-in ballots.

Benson said this month that her office may need up to a week to count ballots received by mail, a timeline that could draw out even longer with the new order.

The聽Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Thursday that mail-in ballots received up to three days after the election would count, provided聽they were postmarked or believed to be postmarked by 8 p.m. on election night.

Donald Trump’s shocking 2016 win came in part because of wins in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Trump edged Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by about 44,000 votes in Pennsylvania. In Michigan, he won by about 10,000 votes.

Follow Zachary on Twitter: @zackstieber

Focus News: Mail-in Ballots Received 2 Weeks Late Must be Counted in Election: Michigan Judge

Barr Defends His Power to Overrule Decisions Made by Lower-Ranking Prosecutors

Attorney General William Barr on Wednesday defended his authority to overrule prosecutorial decisions made by career prosecutors at the Justice Department (DOJ), while describing some of those lawyers as “headhunters” who are too consumed with taking down high-profile targets. “The notion that line prosecutors should make the final decisions within the Department of Justice is completely wrong and it is antithetical to the basic values underlying our system,” Barr said, according to prepared remarks for a speech delivered at Hillsdale College’s annual Constitution Day Celebration on Wednesday night. “Name one successful organization or institution where the lowest level employees’ decisions are deemed sacrosanct. There aren’t any,” he added. Barr has been criticized for decisions to intervene in politically sensitive high-profile cases involving associates of President Donald Trump, such as former…