Skip to content

Justice Department Releases Decades-Old Legal Opinions Backing Trump

Trump Says He Might Bypass Presidential Debate Commission in 2020

….The problem is that the so-called Commission on Presidential Debates is stacked with Trump Haters & Never Trumpers. 3 years ago they were forced to publicly apologize for modulating my microphone in the first debate against Crooked Hillary. As President, the debates are up… — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 16, 2019

Justice Department Releases Decades-Old Legal Opinions Backing Trump

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has recently released several older legal opinions that back the position of President Donald Trump on resisting congressional subpoenas.

The opinions support the position that the president’s executive privilege covers not just himself, but also his advisers who can thus refuse subpoenas from Congress.

“A Congressional demand for testimony from a close adviser to the President directly implicates a basic concern underlying the Executive privilege, ‘the valid need for protection of communications between high Government officials and those who advise and assist them in the performance of their manifold duties,’” says a July 23, 1982, opinion (pdf) written by Theodore Olson, then-assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) for Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s current personal attorney who was an Associate Attorney General at the time.

Six days later, Olson wrote another opinion (pdf) for Edward Schmults, deputy attorney general at the time.

“As far as can be determined, the President and his close advisers have generally not testified before Congressional Committees with respect to the performance of their official duties,” he said. “As Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel William H. Rehnquist expressed it in 1971, ‘The President and his immediate advisers, that is those who customarily meet with him on a regular or frequent basis—should be deemed absolutely immune from testimonial compulsion by a congressional committee.’

Olson acknowledged that “on a few occasions,” presidential advisers have testified, but “it has been in connection with their private affairs.”

OLC opinions are binding for the DOJ, but can be overruled by federal judges.

Impeachment Subpoenas

The Trump administration has been resisting a flurry of congressional subpoenas coming from the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. Democratic lawmakers have introduced two articles of impeachment, accusing Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The obstruction charge is based on the administration resisting subpoenas.

Trump has dismissed the accusations.

“The Impeachment Hoax is the greatest con job in the history of American politics!” he wrote on Twitter on Dec. 16. “The Fake News Media, and their partner, the Democrat Party, are working overtime to make life for the United Republican Party, and all it stands for, as difficult as possible!”

The impeachment inquiry was started after Trump requested to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that he look into the alleged corruption of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Biden bragged in a 2018 interview that he threatened Ukraine with withholding $1 billion in American aid in 2016 unless the Eastern European country fired a prosecutor accused of corruption.

The prosecutor was also investigating a Ukrainian gas company, Burisma, where Hunter Biden was collecting at least hundreds of thousands of dollars as a board member. The son landed the position in 2014 about two months after his father was handed by then-President Barack Obama authority over Ukrainian matters, including billions in aid and loan guarantees.

Trump called Hunter Biden’s Burisma money a “pay off.”

Democrats say Trump abused his power because he pressured Zelensky during a July 25 phone call to investigate the Biden matter in order to hurt Biden’s 2020 presidential bid. Zelensky denied he was pressured. A write up of the call released by Trump doesn’t show he pressured his counterpart.

Giuliani Investigation

Trump said on Dec. 7 that Giuliani will make a report to Congress and Attorney General William Barr about the findings from his meetings with former Ukrainian officials.

Giuliani alleged on Dec. 6 that $5.3 billion in U.S. aid to Ukraine was misused, with much of the money going to nongovernmental organizations favored by the U.S. embassy. According to Giuliani, the U.S. embassy directed Ukrainian officials not to pursue an investigation of the misuse. The embassy was led at the time by Marie Yovanovitch, who was ousted by Trump in May.

This article is from the Internet:Justice Department Releases Decades-Old Legal Opinions Backing Trump

Trump Supporters Erupt at Rep. Slotkin Town Hall After Coming out in Favor of Impeachment

Rep. Elisa Slotkin (D-Mich.) drew backlash at a contentious town hall meeting in Rochester, Michigan, when she tried to explain why she is voting for articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. Slotkin, who represents a district Trump won in 2016, had remained undecided until Monday morning when she penned an opinion piece for the Detroit Free Press. As she tried to offer an argument to her constituents in the town hall meeting, a chorus of boos and jeers erupted. “The thing that [was] different for me was the very, very basic idea that the president of the United States would reach out to a foreign power … for personal political gain,” she said at around the 27-minute mark in a video of the event, echoing claims made by Democratic…