Trump Says Talked With China’s Xi on Trade Deal, Hong Kong, North Korea
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court ordered the FBI to review warrant applications that Kevin Clinesmith—a former FBI lawyer referred for criminal investigation for allegedly removing a key line from an email when applying for a warrant to spy on a Donald Trump campaign aide—was involved with.
The release of the order comes as the court’s very existence comes under pressure from lawmakers after Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz uncovered 17 “significant errors or omissions” in the applications to spy on Carter Page, who worked for Trump’s campaign.
Judge Rosemary Collyer, the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), demanded the FBI “identify all other matters currently or previously before this Court that involved the participation” of the attorney, Clinesmith.
“Describe any steps taken or to be taken by the Department of Justice or FBI to verify that the United States’ submissions in those matters completely and fully described the material facts and circumstances,” she wrote in the order (pdf), which was made public on Dec. 20. “Advise whether the conduct” of the lawyer “has been referred to the I appropriate bar association(s) for investigation or possible disciplinary action.”
According to Horowitz, his team found that Page had a prior relationship with the CIA that became known by FBI agents pursuing a warrant to surveil the Trump aide.
But the FBI failed to disclose that fact to the court and Clinesmith altered an email about the relationship to state that Page was not a CIA source.
Carter Page, petroleum industry consultant and former foreign-policy adviser to Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential election campaign, in Washington on May 28, 2019. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)
Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz testifies in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington on Dec. 11, 2019. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)Clinesmith resigned at some point. He was referred for criminal investigation.
The newly unsealed order from Collyer was dated Dec. 5 and included a Dec. 20 deadline for the FBI to respond to the secretive court, which for the most part is shielded from public view.
Collyer wrote a response to Horowitz’s report on Dec. 17, describing the FBI’s actions as so egregious that the behavior “calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable.”
“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor,” she wrote.
While Collyer didn’t hold back in her criticism, she approved the first FISA application against Page in October 2016 and her court ignored multiple warnings about FISA abuse from Republican lawmakers, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) noted this week.
In the latest letter, Collyer gave the FBI a Jan. 10 deadline on addressing the serious issues.
Also Friday, Collyer, who also serves as a senior judge on the Washington federal court, announced she is reigning as presiding judge on the FISA court at the end of the year, several months before her term was set to expire.
Judge James Boasberg was selected by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to replace Collyer, who will remain on the court until her term expires in March 2020.
This article is from the Internet:FISA Court Orders Review of Warrant Applications From FBI Lawyer Referred for Criminal Investigation
Top US Military General Pushes Back on Washington Post’s Afghanistan Reports