Skip to content

Clean Network Program Aims to Stop CCP Telecommunications Intrusion

  • Asia

Fauci: Chances of CCP Virus Vaccine Being Highly Effective Are ‘Not Great’

The prospect of scientists developing a highly effective CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus vaccine is “not great,” according to Dr. Anthony Fauci. Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is a top infectious disease expert. Speaking about the vaccine in a discussion with the Brown University School of Public Health, Fauci said Friday, “The chances of it being 98 percent effective is not great, which means you must never abandon the public health approach.” Vaccine effectiveness refers to the percentage of people given vaccines who are actually protected from infection. As of now, it’s unclear whether CCP virus vaccines will even protect one out of every two people that get them, according to Fauci. “We don’t know yet what the efficacy might be,” he said, but added,…

U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo announced the Clean Network program on Aug. 5, aimed at stopping CCP鈥檚 aggressive intrusions through telecommunications and the Internet.

On April 29, 2020, Secretary Pompeo announced that the U.S. Department of State will begin requiring a Clean Path for all 5G network traffic entering and exiting U.S. diplomatic facilities. The 5G Clean Path is an end-to-end communication path that does not use any transmission, control, computing, or storage equipment from untrusted IT vendors, such as Huawei and ZTE, which are required to comply with the CCP鈥檚 directives.

Focus News: Clean Network Program Aims to Stop CCP Telecommunications Intrusion

Jeffrey Epstein’s Alleged Victims Get Chance to Challenge Plea Deal, Appeal Court Rules

Alleged victims of deceased convicted sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein will have a chance to challenge a federal non-prosecution agreement—often referred to as Epstein’s “sweetheart” plea deal—that was signed more than a decade ago. Courtney Wild, an Epstein accuser originally known as Jane Doe 1, as well as another plaintiff known as Jane Doe 2, had filed an original lawsuit in 2008 to overturn the non-prosecution agreement. They argued that the Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors had violated their rights under the 2004 Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CRVA) by sealing the deal without consulting with or informing the alleged victims. The Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit court ruled on Friday (pdf) that the alleged victims will have their case reheard en banc—a legal term to mean that a case gets to…

Tags: