Skip to content

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances 

  • Asia

Popcorn and Inspiraton: ‘Heaven Is for Real’: Daring, Disarming, Dogma-Challenging

PG | 1h 39min | Biography, Drama, Family | 16 April 2014 (USA) America’s best products are movies and music. So what’s the deal with Christian movies? While they unfailingly have the best of intentions, they tend to share an overly saccharine sweetness. But is it that they’re actually too sweet, or that today’s society has become too sophisticated and jaded? The latter, of course. “Heaven Is for Real” falls solidly in the saccharine category; however, the story itself is quite interesting. It’s also true. Colton Burpo (Connor Corum, L) walks with Jesus, in “Heaven Is for Real.” (TriStar Pictures)The Pastor and His Son Todd Burpo (Greg Kinnear) is an Iowan pastor, volunteer fireman, wrestling coach, and business owner. He’s a do-gooder of extreme do-goodness. He keeps it real; his…

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances 

A group of farmers from Shanghai and a couple from Hubei Province have filed lawsuits against the Chinese central government, seeking compensation for alleged government malfeasance. In a rare sign of direct protest against the Communist Party leadership, premier Li Keqiang was listed as one of the defendants.

The plaintiffs have repeatedly appealed their grievances to government agencies via formal petitions, to no avail.

They have filed lawsuits as a last resort.

“Our painful experience tells us that petitioning is an impassable path, and that [the process] is not protected or supervised by the law,”the Shanghai farmers wrote in their lawsuit.

The lawsuits were mailed to courts in Beijing. At the time of writing, the plaintiffs have not yet received a response from the courts.

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances  A Hubei couple He Bin and Xu Caihong files lawsuit with with the country’s highest court, the Supreme People’s Court on Oct. 24, 2020. (Screenshot)

Hubei Couple

47-year-old He Bin and his 50-year-old wife Xu Caihong filed their lawsuit with the country’s highest court, the Supreme People’s Court, on Oct. 24. They named as defendants the head of the central government, Li Keqiang, and the head of China’s rubber stamp legislature, Li Zhanshu.

In the lawsuit, He and Xu claimed that officials forced their restaurants to shut down. They traveled to Beijing to petition their grievances. However, they were frequently harassed by police.

In several phone interviews with the Chinese-language Epoch Times, the couple spoke of their experience appealing to the authorities.

He and Xu were workers at the Hubei Chemical Fiber Factory in Xiangfan city until around 2000, when their employer laid off staff.

The couple also owned a store in downtown Xiangfan to sell goods to young consumers, such as fine stationery, fashionable gifts and jewelry, and so on. After getting laid off, they devoted all their time to running the store. The business was flourishing, which angered their competitor—who had ties with local officials and gangsters, they alleged.

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances  He Bin uses his two hands to show “Six” and “Four” to commemorate the June 4th Tiananmen Square Massacre at Tiananmen Square in Beijing, China on June 4, 2016. (Provided to The Epoch Times by Xu Caihong)

In 2001, He was detained by local authorities, on what he said were false charges. Xu appealed to government agencies for half a year, hoping to set him free. Months later, he was finally released with all charges dropped.

However, soon after He was released, gangsters broke into their store and destroyed almost all the goods. The thugs told the couple that they were operating under orders from an official at the Fancheng District Court, He said.

The couple were forced to shut down their store and began a six-year long legal fight, including filing lawsuits against owners of the competitor store and officials at the district court. They also traveled to the petition bureau in Wuhan (the province’s capital) and the national petition bureau in Beijing.

One winter, Xu, while pregnant, was detained by police at a so-called “law education center” in Fancheng district due to her petitioning. Several plainclothes officers surrounded her and beat her until she suffered a miscarriage. Her injuries caused her to become unable to conceive again.

In 2008, the couple accepted the compensation district authorities arranged for them, which was 120,000 yuan ($18,150) in cash with social security insurance for both of them. He and Xu then used the money to operate a small restaurant, located inside a building owned by the Fancheng District Court.

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances  Xu Caihong uses her two hands to show “Six” and “Four” to commemorate the June 4th Tiananmen Square Massacre at Tiananmen Square in Beijing, China on June 4, 2016. (Provided to The Epoch Times by Xu Caihong)

In 2010, the court suddenly announced that the building needed to be renovated, and drove away all tenants, including the couple—though their leases were not up yet. After He and Xu moved out of the building, the court rented out the restaurant at a higher price to another tenant, without doing any renovations.

He and Xu then started their second round of petitioning in Beijing.

Being listed on authorities’ blacklist, He and Xu were stopped by police on the streets in Beijing after surveillance cameras detected their location. A small restaurant they operated in Beijing was then raided by police during the winter of 2017. The police told the landlord to throw away all their belongings, the couple said.

In the past few years, they were detained multiple times while petitioning during the Chinese regime’s national conferences and key meetings in Beijing.

He and Xu wrote in the lawsuit: “We think that the inactions of defendants [Li Keqiang and Li Zhanshu] caused, aggravated, and encouraged all these infringements [on our rights]…We ask defendants to actively correct themselves and take responsibility.”

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances  56 Shanghai farmers file lawsuit with the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court against the State Council in October 2020. (Screenshot)

Shanghai Farmers

Shi Kehua and 55 fellow farmers lived in Gaodong, Gaonan, and Yangyuan townships in Chuansha county, Shanghai.

In 1992, Shanghai divided these three townships into the Pudong Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone. The 56 farmers and their neighbors had to give up their homes to the local government to redevelop. They signed contracts in which the government promised to arrange new equivalent accommodations for them.

However, the apartments assigned to the farmers were much smaller than their original homes.

“We, 56 plaintiffs, owned in total 10,542.3 square meters (113,476.4 square feet) of free land to build houses and 11,029.15 square meters (118,716.78 square feet) houses [in 1992],” the farmers wrote in the lawsuit. “The accommodations that authorities arranged for us are only 6,249.69 square meters (67,271.1 square feet) in housing in total, which is 4779.46 square meters (43.33 percent) less.”

The farmers have repeatedly petitioned and complained to the Shanghai municipal government for decades, but received no response.

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances  Farmers work in the fields in Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China on June 6, 2018. (VCG/VCG via Getty Images)

On Aug. 20, 2018, the farmers applied to the Shanghai government for property protection, according to official records. The government did not respond to their request.

A few months later on Dec. 20, the farmers filed an application for authorities to reconsider their request for property protection—a right granted by China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law. Six days later, the Shanghai government replied, saying the farmers must go through the petitioning process to make the request.

The farmers felt frustrated and filed a new reconsideration application to China’s cabinet-like State Council on Jan. 5, 2019.

Having waited for over a year, the farmers finally got a response on April 3 this year, in which the State Council claimed that they did not have enough documentation to support their application.

“Which documents did we miss?” the farmers asked in the lawsuit. “We have plenty of verification documents.”

On Oct. 6, the farmers filed a lawsuit with the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court against the State Council, which is headed by premier Li Keqiang, to ask the central government to reconsider their case again and give them redress.

Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances  Cars pass the Shanghai Waigaoqiao Power Generator Company coal power plant in Shanghai, China on March 22, 2016. (JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images)

Petitioners in China are frequently harassed and detained.

Every year during the rubber-stamp legislature’s sessions, thousands of petitioners would gather in front of the national petition bureau every day. But police frequently arrest them or drive them back to their hometowns.

In April 2009, Chinese human rights lawyer Zheng Enchong estimated in a Hong Kong magazine article that the country had about 20 million petitioners.

It’s unclear how many petitioners are in China now. Hundreds of them have immigrated overseas and sometimes show up to protest Chinese leaders’ state visits.

For example, Shanghai petitioner Jin Yuehua stopped the motorcade of Chinese vice premier Liu He in Washington D.C. on May 10, 2019.

Focus News: Citizens File Lawsuits Against Chinese Central Government, Seeking Justice for Grievances 

Rediscovering the Art of Poetry

There is something magical about a well-written poem. Using nothing more than ink on paper, one can experience the same thrill as produced by a scene that costs millions of dollars to put on the big screen; one can experience the same momentous payoff that may take hundreds of pages of novel reading to reach. No screen, no battery, no app required—heck, not even electricity required. And yet, if you were asked to mention a magical experience of reading a poem that you recently read, chances are you would be hard-pressed to produce one. That is the reality of poetry reading today. The really good poetry was written by some dead poet, who is eternally removed from the present. As good as a poem may be, the feeling of connection…