Skip to content

China and the Other Kind of Disinformation

  • Asia

In Hong Kong, Pro-Democracy Lawmakers Released on Bail As City Engulfed in Violence

In Hong Kong, seven pro-democracy lawmakers have been granted bail after appearing in a local court in the afternoon of Nov. 11. The seven lawmakers—Eddie Chu, Au Nok-hin, Raymond Chan, Gary Fan, Kwok Ka-ki, Leung Yiu-chung, and Lam Cheuk-ting—were accused of violating article 19 of the Legislative Council Ordinance, which deals with assault and obstruction of members of the city’s Legislative Council (LegCo). Police brought charges against the lawmakers because of a May 11 incident, when several lawmakers got into a scuffle while debating the since-withdrawn extradition bill that ignited the ongoing protests. Local prosecutors alleged that the seven lawmakers obstructed three members of the pro-Beijing party Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB) on May 11, according to local media. The seven appeared in the…

Smoke billows from stacks as Chinese men pull a tricycle in a neighborhood next to a coal fired power plant in Shanxi, China, on Nov. 26, 2015. (Kevin Frayer/Getty Images)

Commentary

There’s a great deal of talk today about fake news and disinformation. Almost always, the object of the disinformation is someone or something that’s receiving allegedly undeserved criticism. That’s not the only way disinformation can work, however. Sometimes it can “frame” an object in a positive manner.

As the Russian/Soviet intelligence agencies developed the art of disinformation into what they called a science, it was every bit as important to be able to cast a positive light on an entity or individual (usually the reigning leader) as it was to be able to put someone in a bad light.

It looks like China is engaged in a similar disinformation effort, especially when it comes to carbon emissions and climate change. The effort has been going on for some time.

In 2007, reacting to an announcement by China that blamed the United States for global warming, former Vice President Al Gore said, “They’re right in saying that.”

In fact, Gore said, “emerging economies such as China are justified in holding back on fighting greenhouse gas emissions until richer polluters like the United States do more to solve the problem,” The Associated Press reported.

Gore was in China in 2011 to address the Global Urban Development Forum. He praised China’s communist regime for its “unusual success” in carbon-reduction measures.

In December 2017, Gore praised China’s new “carbon market” as “another powerful sign that a global sustainability revolution is underway. … It is clear that we’re at a tipping point in the climate crisis.”

One year later in Poland (not quite a year ago), he praised China’s leadership for tackling climate change, saying that China is “one of the few countries on track to meet its Paris commitment,” according to China’s state-run news agency Xinhua. He went on to explain that China had already exceeded some of its own targets on renewables. (More on China’s targets below.)

In 2011, James Hansen, the retired NASA scientist who has been called the “father of climate change awareness,” called the Chinese regime the “best hope” to save the world from global warming. He even called for an economic boycott to force the United States to match China’s effort. In 2015, Hansen again said that he expected China to provide the carbon emissions reduction leadership that the United States had been unwilling to provide.

Gore and Hansen aren’t the only environmental activists who have said good things about China, nor are these the only times that they have spoken on the subject, but these serve as examples to provide a flavor of the way global warming activists talk about the communist dictatorship in China.

The amazing thing here is that China has had the world’s largest carbon footprint since 2006. In 2017, it was responsible for 27.2 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions, according to the Global Carbon Atlas. China is also one of the world’s largest emitters of methane, another greenhouse gas. In fact, methane is 34 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas.

China’s problem is coal. It may be the world’s biggest producer of solar panels, but a lot of them are built for export. China runs on coal. It’s both the world’s leading producer and the world’s leading consumer of coal, and its capacity is expanding. From 1985 to 2016, coal provided about 70 percent of China’s energy. That, of course, came at a high environmental cost.

Coal produces up to twice the amount of carbon dioxide as other fossil fuels. While China reports that its coal usage has declined since 2014, it still consumes more coal than the rest of the world combined. As of 2017, coal provides over 60 percent of the nation’s total energy use, according to ChinaPower.

Just last year, the Chinese regime approved development of seven new coal mines. That means that between 2017 and 2018, the nation added almost 200 million tons of new coal mining capacity. Then this year, China allocated funding for 17 more new coal mines across the nation. China’s CO2 emissions grew by an estimated 4 percent in the first half of 2019. Over that same time period, the nation’s coal demand increased by 3 percent, its oil demand increased by 6 percent, and gas demand increased by 12 percent.

Of course, coal mined in one area needs to be shipped if it’s to be used in another area. China just opened the Menghua Railway, the nation’s longest coal transporting railway line. This railway, over 1,000 miles long, is expected to carry about 200 million tons of coal annually from the mining areas in northern China to the industrial hub in the South.

None of this expansion in mining or shipping bodes well for the air quality in China, which is already a significant problem. In a recent poll sponsored by state-run newspaper China Daily, more respondents listed pollution as their number one concern than anything else. The expansion also suggests that perhaps China is not the model of enlightenment when it comes to combating man-made climate change.

Of course, for the disinformation campaign to succeed, criticism must be suppressed. Recently, the China Meteorological Administration issued regulations prohibiting weather forecasts by anyone other than the state’s official meteorological agencies. Violators are subject to fines of almost $8,000.

Perhaps even more disconcerting, in 2015, a former TV journalist in Beijing released a feature-length documentary titled “Under the Dome.” It has been called China’s version of Al Gore’s climate change documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.” Millions of Chinese people watched “Under the Dome” online and saw its criticism of the Chinese regime for tolerating poor air quality. Within a week of it being posted, however, major Chinese websites pulled it down under orders from the Communist Party’s central propaganda department.

Open debate—especially criticism of the government—cannot be tolerated. Even the “progress” that China’s defenders cite when hailing the nation’s environmental record are misleading.

Regarding China’s “targets,” it has pledged to reduce “carbon emission intensity,” but the nation has not promised to impose an emissions ceiling. “Carbon emission intensity” measures the amount of carbon released per dollar of economic activity. Thus, with more economic activity, more emissions can be justified. So, total emission levels might continue to climb, and China would still be meeting its targets as long as economic growth outpaces those emissions. That is not the kind of promise Western nations are making or being asked to make.

In the end, this is a beautiful piece of disinformation. China aggressively pursues its economic agenda using the least expensive energy available to it. It’s able to claim to be meeting its environmental goals, and Western “experts” point to it as an example of environmental responsibility. Moscow would be proud.

Ronald J. Rychlak is the Jamie L. Whitten chair in law and government at the University of Mississippi. He is the author of several books, including “Hitler, the War, and the Pope,” “Disinformation” (co-authored with Ion Mihai Pacepa), and “The Persecution and Genocide of Christians in the Middle East” (co-edited with Jane Adolphe).

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

This article is from the Internet:China and the Other Kind of Disinformation

Police Fire Live Rounds at 2 Protesters As Hong Kong Engulfed in Citywide Strike

Violence escalated in Hong Kong on Nov. 11 after local police fired live rounds at protesters who were engaged in citywide strike action. The shooting took place in the neighborhood of Sai Wan Ho when protesters tried to block roads. One police officer pointed his gun at point-blank range at a protester wearing a white hoodie before grabbing him by the neck. A second protester dressed in black approached the officer and then tried to swat the gun from his hand. He was shot by the police officer at close range and collapsed to the ground. Two more protesters approached the officer from behind, and the officer fired two more shots at close range. One of the protesters also fell to the ground. The shooting, which took place before 8…