Skip to content

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption

  • Art

Australian PM Walks Middle Path on Post-Virus Support

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has warned against creating a dependency on COVID-19 support measures as economists urge the government to continue welfare schemes. The Grattan Institute has recommended the government spend between $70 billion and $90 billion on extra economic stimulus measures. The International Monetary Fund is calling for a gradual exit from support programs, with public investment to accelerate the recovery. Morrison says economists vary across the spending spectrum. “They want us to spend nothing and they want us to spend everything – the truth is going to be somewhere in the middle,” he said on July 2. He said the government would not let dependence on support stop businesses, and the federal budget, from bouncing back. “That will cost jobs and livelihoods,” Morrison said. “The other thing is,…

R | | Action, Crime, Drama | 9 July 1993 (USA)

When aging Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan (Clint Eastwood), in rooftop pursuit, jumps to another roof in 1993’s “In the Line of Fire,” he narrowly avoids a death-fall into the alley.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan (Clint Eastwood) jumps between buildings in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

As he hangs on for dear life, the man he’s chasing, Mitch Leary (John Malkovich), a psychopathic former CIA assassin, offers Frank a helping hand.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Frank (Clint Eastwood) hangs on to a building ledge and life, in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

This is the essence of “In the Line of Fire,” a top-tier cat-and-mouse thriller: Assassin Mitch revels in the irony that the U.S. government trained Frank to protect and Mitch to kill, and yet on that rooftop, protector-Frank tried to kill killer-Mitch, while killer-Mitch tried to protect protector-Frank.

These two central characters, with their recurring (rotary) phone calls, are the two pillars upon which “In the Line of Fire” rests: Mitch taunting Frank and rubbing salt in his formidable psychological wounds (in his earlier career, Frank failed to save JFK in Dallas in ’63), while Frank tries to keep Mitch on the phone long enough to be traced by the FBI.

Appetizer

To get the ball rolling, Frank and his new younger partner Al (Dylan McDermott) do some very dicey undercover work, which ends up with Al strapped to a chair with a plastic bag over his head. Frank proves that, although he may be old and politically incorrect, he’s Cool Hand Luke under fire. Or, more appropriately, Dirty Harry.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Undercover agents Frank Horrigan (Clint Eastwood, L) and Al D’Andrea (Dylan McDermott) in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

Al, on the other hand, is a hot mess; he’s rattled, he sniffles, he doubts his ability to be a good agent. Frank tells him to buck up and learn to use the word “cockamamie” in a sentence; it’s a word Al’s generation hasn’t embraced yet. He should keep it alive.

Entrée

It’s now 1992, the presidential election machine is ramped up, and embittered Mitch Leary is going president hunting. As mentioned, this is no amateur “Soldier of Fortune”-reading, video-game-playing recluse, but a stone-cold ex-CIA black ops agent so vicious that even one of his former CIA colleagues refers to him as a predator.

Mitch has a date with death, as he tells Frank, and since this assassination will be Mitch’s magnum opus, he leaves clues for Frank to follow. And so, because he’s a master spy and could kill Frank at any time, the roles of who’s the cat and who’s the mouse become blurred. As Mitch says, he’s on offense and Frank’s on defense. It’s a classic sports match-up in a sense—the best of the best going up against each other.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption The lair of former CIA assassin Mitch Leary in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

We see Mitch at work at his craft, concocting in his lab, pouring liquid epoxy into molds, calibrating, filing, and putting the finishing touches on a metal-detector-defeating plastic gun, replete with a hollow rabbit’s foot keychain fob. It holds the metal bullets that, sleight-of-hand-wise, don’t get noticed going around the metal detector, while the plastic gun isn’t noticed going through it.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Former CIA assassin Mitch Leary tests his undetectable plastic gun in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

We see Mitch test his gun on two yokel duck hunters. We see Mitch inadvertently expose a gap in his cover story to a bank clerk, and, meticulous about loose ends, he follows her home and murders her and her roommate.

Dessert

Clint is vintage Clint with all his Clintisms here, and that almost always means quality. But Malkovich was nominated by seven different award associations for Best Supporting Actor.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Former CIA assassin Mitch Leary (John Malkovich) firing at a Secret Service agent in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

A great stage actor, Malkovich plays Mitch like a fallen angel who cartwheeled into the lowest pits of hell, and while he sees the glory of his former military and patriotic honor reflected in Frank, he wonders about Frank’s demons. He queries in a taunting manner, but it’s clear he’s looking for coping clues and probably fishing for tidbits of wisdom from a fellow traveler of sorts, as to where the entrance for the path to redemption can be found.

Mitch’s profound sense of betrayal stemming from the CIA’s sending his best friend and comrade in arms to Mitch’s home to kill him is extremely palpable. But will he find redemption? Or will Frank redeem his own failure to protect President Kennedy?

There’s a romantic subplot between Frank and fellow agent Lilly Raines (Rene Russo), which has a similar paradoxical feel to the killer-protector relationship: She’s much younger than Frank, but functions as older by way of her mothering, nurturing nature. She’s also more grounded professionally by dint of the fact that she’s young, hungry, in a leadership position, and squared away in terms of technology. Frank’s sociologically, culturally, and technologically a bit of a dinosaur.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Agents Lilly Raines (Rene Russo) and Frank Horrigan (Clint Eastwood) in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

Speaking of dinosaurs, Frank’s pickup lines regarding Lilly were already clunky and almost unbearably chauvinistic (even though it’s all said in jest) 27 years ago. Now, it’s laughable.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Secret Service agent Lilly Raines (Rene Russo) in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

But while the dating stuff is dated, the movie’s traditional values concerning classic first-responder, law enforcement, military, and Secret Service/FBI/CIA-agent hero-types who dutifully put their lives on the line for patriotism is timeless. “In the Line of Fire” is a top-notch thriller that remains, almost 30 years later, one of the best examples of the genre.

Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan (Clint Eastwood) guarding the presidential motorcade in “In the Line of Fire.” (Columbia Pictures)

“In the Line of Fire”
Director: Wolfgang Petersen
Starring: Clint Eastwood, John Malkovich, Rene Russo, Dylan McDermott, Gary Cole, Fred Thompson
Rating: R
Running Time: 2 hours, 8 minutes
Release date: July 19, 1993
Rated: 4 stars out of 5

Follow Mark on Twitter: @FilmCriticEpoch

Focus News: Popcorn and Inspiration: ‘In the Line of Fire’: Assassin’s Revenge Versus Secret Service Redemption

Australia’s Trade Surplus Rose 2Pct in May

Australia’s trade surplus rose 2.0 percent to $8.03 billion in May, as imports fell faster than exports. Exports dropped 4.0 percent to $35.7 billion, while imports dropped 6.0 percent to $27.7 billion, data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed on July 2. Imports of consumption goods was steeply lower, down 14 percent to $8.9 billion. Exports of rural goods fell 10 percent to $3.6 million, driven by a 31 percent drop in cereal grains and cereal preparations. Coal export earnings dropped by 13.3 percent, or $635 million. “Australia’s international trade surplus has – on balance – been boosted by the net impacts of the pandemic,” Westpac economist Andrew Hanlan said in a note. “Imports are trending lower as domestic demand contracts. Goods exports, while not immune from the global…